Post Before “read more” And here is the rest of it
A furious Kagame broke off ties with France, and in turn accused the French of abetting the genocide, demanding why they had taken no action during the crisis. Another major blow has been a Spanish court's verdict, indicting 3 officers close to Kagame, of genocide of Hutus, as well as civilians during the Second Congo War.
People must bring a machete, a spear, an arrow, a hoe, spades, rakes, nails, truncheons, electric irons, barbed wire, stones, and the like, in order, dear listeners, to kill the Rwandan Tutsis. - From a Radio station in Congo.
The other flash point was the presence of the Banyamungele, a tribe of Tutsi Rwandans living near the Congo-Rwanda border. When Laurent Kabila the Congolese dictator, ordered all the Rwandan and Ugandan forces to leave Congo, it alarmed this tribe, who had played a major role during the first Congo War. In 1998, Kagame backed the Banyamungele in a major uprising against the Congolese Govt, through a newly formed outfit the Rally for Congolese Democracy,and within time, they took over the entire resource rich South Kivu plateau in Congo. Kabila enlisted the aid of the Hutus in eastern Congo, and lynchings of the Tutsis again began, it was Rwanda 1994 all over. Initially beaten back, Kabila however embarked on a diplomatic offensive, that saw Namibia, Zimbabwe, Angola, Chad, Libya, Sudan, all come to the aid of Kabila. It was another major war, that once again left the Congo devastated, from which it has yet to recover still. Kagame used the war as a proxy for his Tutsi based militias, to attack the Hutu refugee camps in a reprisal of the 1994 genocide.
The fact that a Tutsi was elected president for the first time by Hutus, Tutsis and Twas is proof that these communities have reconciled themselves after the genocide.His election is a good thing for Rwanda.- A resident of Rwanda in 2003, after Kagame won the elections.
Bizimungu was forced to resign in 2000 by Kagame, who then became the President. Bizimungu's attempt to start his own party, was in vain, when Kagame placed him under house arrest, banned his party on the grounds of being an extremist Hutu party, and later sent him to prison on grounds of embezzlement and fraud. The 2003 elections, saw Kagame storming to power, the first ever since the 1994 genocide. Kagame called it as a vote for change, a chance to put aside the country's painful past. Kagame's biggest challenge however was dealing with the aftermath of the 1994 genocide. Kagame to his credit, took a major role in prosecuting the perpetrators of the 1994 genocide. He was however faced with a major problem, Rwanda itself was a small nation, and putting all the perpetrators in prison meant, that more than 80% of the population would be inside. The genocide in Rwanda was somewhat different from those in Bosnia or Germany, the perpetrators and victims, were still in the same place. In effect it meant that, the neighbour right next door, was one of the perpetrators, and unlike Germany or Bosnia, where the Jews and Bosnians fled to other lands, it was different here.
But soon we had 130,000 in jail—and many more outside,The genocide in our country involved a huge percentage of our population, both in terms of those who were killed and those who killed.
What Kagame did was to establish a system of local village councils, essentially the gacaca courts, as they were called, where those who perpetrated the genocide, confessed, forgiven and later integrated into the local communities. It was a traditional Rwandan approach, and one that worked. In Kagame's approach, he felt that reconciliation was needed between the Hutsis and Tutsis, instead of more bitterness, both of them were needed for the nation's future. Kagame has some valid points to make about the Western approach to Africa, especially their over reliance on aid. In an interview, he had praised China for bringing what the Africans really needed, infrastructure and jobs, unlike the West, which only focused on an aid centric approach. Kagame like his Ugandan counterpart Museveni has been a votary of free trade and private enterprise, which he sees the only way out in Africa.

His commitment to free trade and private enterprise, was what made Kagame, the darling of the Western leaders, with high praise from Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, as well as media figures like Fareed Zakaria. All the effusive praise, cannot however unmask an appalling human rights record which is one of the worst in Africa. Paul Kagame actually makes Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, seem a paragon of free speech, democracy and human rights, and that says a lot. Rwanda is ranked by Reporters Without Borders as the worst place for journalists along with N.Korea, Syria, Myanmar and Yemen, certainly not company of which one would be proud . This article by African Dictator says it a lot of the lack of press freedom in Rwanda. Most of the independent press has been suspended, and Kagame has followed the Chinese, in allowing the Net, but censoring it for his own advantage. In June 2010 Jean-Léonard Rugambage a Rwandan editor of Umuvugizi, one of their leading newspapers was shot dead in front his residence. Rugambage had been one of Kagame's harshest critics, and was about to expose him in an attempted murder of Faustin Kayumba Nyamwasa, a former Army General, who had fallen out with Kagame. Add to it Kagame's use of child soldiers in the conflict in Congo, and worse of all the excesses during the 2010 election. André Kagwa Rwisereka his political opponent in the elections belonging to the Democratic Green Party was found murdered and beheaded. These were just some of the more high profile cases, there have been thousands of ordinary Rwandans, political dissidents, journalists, reporters, who have simply disappeared.
Acknowledgement
1) African Dictator - Rwanda’s media in a state of hesitation.1
2) Africa's Biggest success story- Fared Zakaria. 2
3) Africa's new Path by Fared Zakaria in Newsweek 3


"Unfortunately, both [Museveni and Kagame], have fallen prey to their own megalomania, seeing themselves as the Lord protector of the nation, whom none shall disobey."
ReplyDeleteThis can be written about virtually all politicians, whether or not elected - all those individuals who want others to follow their own directives, who think that others cannot be trusted to live orderly lives without being lead/threatened/pushed into making decisions/taking actions that are "acceptable". And of course such individuals discourage any and all actions that would promote true self-responsibility and, likewise, accountability to others. They will incite, inspire and promote thinking of "them vs us" with exaggerations, lies and even arranging for agents provocateur. Of course these last are enforcers - either legalized when part of the official government or simply warlord thugs - but basically always individuals willing to initiate physical harm on others. And these enforcers are the KEY since none of the politicians/warlords are out in the fields/byways/villages/cities creating the physical harm, though they may have in earlier years as lieutenants to some earlier BIG THUG.
The report here demonstrates something that is the case for virtually all politicians: they are not evil (in the sense that WANT to do harm just for its own sake), they simply think that they have the answer AND must be obeyed. Some of their ideas are actually good - at least better than their own or others' previously promoted ideas. The described "gacaca courts" are an example; a traditional African solution to a very serious problem of longstanding hatred and violence between ethnic groups. I wonder whether restitution played any part in the "later integrat[ion] into the local communities", something I think is essential for truly seeing that justice occurs.
Kagame appears to be much like the many other more or less benevolent dictators around the globe - willing to have enforcers remove obstacles (a newspaper editor, a former colleague, etc) while at the same time encouraging and even physically forcing (via enforcers again) changes in the society that actually benefit many, like roads, sewers, schools, etc. (These changes of course can take place without the considerable harm that accompanies any government but that's not something politicians want the ordinary people to realize.)
Other than informing readers of the history of Paul Kagame, I don't understand the purpose of this piece since no solution is given or even hinted at.
I'll simply close with a clear statement that Paul Kagame is NOTHING without his ENFORCERS - those who are willing to initiate physical force/create physical harm towards those in the area. The people of Rwanda need to understand this - as do all people everywhere in regards to the rulers who operate in their own areas. Were these enforcers shamed, shunned and ostracized by the far larger non-enforcer population there would be far fewer individuals willing to take on such employment, and as a result the Kagames of Africa (and elsewhere) would be far weaker. Before people simply turn "allegiance" to some other warlord/politician who will in essence be no better than the one they rejected, people need to question whether government is a true necessity (necessary "evil" is often more easily acknowledged) and if some other way is not actually possible for social order - a society where each individual is able to optimally increase his/her lifetime Happiness (the purpose of life whether or not s/he realizes it), all at the same time. I contend that such an alternative to government IS possible, and that Africa with its traditional roots is actually a viable location for people to move from being mental pawns of an elite few to self-responsible accountable interacting individuals. For more: "Social Meta-Needs: A New Basis for Optimal Interaction" - http://selfsip.org/fundamentals/socialmetaneeds.html